Page 15 - 2nd Issue_Newsletter_online
P. 15

15
           Nurturing Creators or                    or aesthetics. This year, Ms  Ching  put
           Programming Extinction?                  this to the test with her Form 2 students.

           The Teachers’ Perspectives               Tasked with creating a four-panel comic,
                                                    the students were then told to use AI to
           ‘Right now, AI cannot replace us — that’s   replicate their hand-drawn work. ‘They
           t he ba s el i ne of ou r c re at iv it y a nd   quickly realised that their own versions
           uniqueness,’ notes our Visual Arts teacher   were often much better,’ Ms Ching smiles.
           Ms Joan Chik. ‘But if AI manages to      ‘But I wanted them to notice the subtle
           bre a k  t h at?  We  r i s k  b e c om i n g  t he   differences, which can ultimately lead
           dinosaurs of the modern age.’ It begs    to creative improvements.’ She a lso
           a crucial question: are we nurturing     encourages her students to explain their
           the next generation of genuine creators,   thoughts, noting, ‘Relying on predefined
           o r pr o g r a m m i n g o u r ow n a r t i s t i c   a nswers does not add dept h to t he
           extinction?                              artwork, but using it in the right way


           A s A I to ol s b e c ome s t aple s i n t he   can lead to better learning.’
           classroom, educators are tasked with an
           unprecedented challenge: helping students
           navigate technology while preserving
           their unique style. To understand how
           this balance is struck, we sat down with
           ou r VA teachers Ms Joa n Ch i k a nd
           Ms Cathy Ching.
                                                     Student’s work of four-panel comic (left)
           There is no doubt that                    and the AI-generated version of the
           AI is rapidly transforming                comic (right).
           t he creat ive process.
           Rather than resisting it,                However, technological advancements
           Ms Ching encourages                      are not without their risks. In fact, one
           students to maintain an                  of the major concerns is a decline in
           open mind, viewing the                   independent creative thinking. How do
           technology as a valuable                 we prevent students from over-relying
           assistant. ‘Honestly, I                  on AI?
           don’t have any strong
           objections,’  she points                 For both educators, the answer lies in
           out. ‘Once these platforms opened, I saw   the irreplaceable nature of the human
           how quickly text could turn into an image.   touch. ‘At this moment, AI cannot help
           It saves time on early-stage work, like   us express personal feelings,’ Ms Chik
           finding references or sketching out ideas   remarks. ‘AI will give you nice results,
           that might otherwise take hours to do    but we still need to digest and transform
           manually.’ By accelerating the iterative   that output into our own work, which
           process, AI allows students to explore and   c a n even be ha rder t ha n doi ng t he
           ‘try out new styles’ to discover new patterns   paintings by ourselves.’
   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20